Posts Tagged ‘demoncrats’

Obama’s Birth Scam: Birth Certificate Vs. Certification Of Live Birth

November 20, 2009

Where there’s smoke there’s fire.  Obama and his handlers have done everything shady possible in the handling of his birth question.  ALL IT WOULD TAKE TO CLEAR THIS UP IS TO PROVIDE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE WITH A DOCTOR’S NAME, HOSPITAL and ETC.  The CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH is a scam, read below…

I’ll cover his citizenship problem and why people (like Snopes) are fsck’d up on this later.

And for you Obamanites who claim that there is no difference between a Certification of Live Birth and a Birth Certificate, we, as well as the State of Hawaii, would have to disagree with you.

“[§338-17.8]  Certificates for children born out of State.
(a)  Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b)  Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate.  The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c)  The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”

Everybody get that?

As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.

The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.

THE ARTICLE: Birth Certificate Vs. Certification Of Live Birth

Advertisements

Scummy House Democrats Sneak Healthcare Vote Through

November 9, 2009

TODAY’S USEFUL IDIOT: Steve Kangas! Oh wait…

March 7, 2009

I was browsing around the internet today and I ran across this pathetic attempt to re-write history and paint the moron Carter in a better light.

“Carter cannot be blamed for the double-digit inflation that peaked on his watch, because inflation started growing in 1965 and snowballed for the next 15 years.”

Having lived through these years, I clearly remember what a disaster Carter was.

“In 1980, the ‘misery index’ — unemployment plus inflation — crested 20 percent for the first time since World War II. Ronald Reagan blamed this on Jimmy Carter, and went on to win the White House. Reagan then caught the business cycle on an upswing, for what conservatives call ‘the Seven Fat Years” or “the longest economic expansion in peacetime history.’

Were either of these presidents responsible for their fortune with the economy? No. Carter battled the peak of an inflationary trend that began in 1965. In the following chart, take special notice of the long, slow climb in the inflation column…”

Carter didn’t battle the peak of an inflationary trend that began in 1965, HE CAUSED THE PEAK(S)! Reagan didn’t catch the business cycle on an upswing, HE CAUSED THE ECONOMIC UPSWING. I was there, I remember! The markets (and pretty much everyone) were so happy to be rid of Carter that things just got better on the news. Hell, even Iran returned the hostages on the news of Reagan’s win.

Anyway, not being satisfied with actually living through it and knowing what happened, I looked at Kangas’ own data. Here is a graph, made from Kangas’ own data, that pretty much proves Carter was the force behind the economic disaster that was the 1970s.  PLEASE NOTE: Unlike the presidents, Nixon, Ford & Reagan, Carter’s I*U line only increases.

gloriouscarteryears1

[Un]fortunately, this nut-ball Steve Kangas died in 1999 so this award has to be awarded posthumus. It will still be awarded because some other kook is keeping his site up and running.

A Letter From The Boss…

January 21, 2009

Whether it’s real or not doesn’t matter, the message is still dead on-

A Boss Who Tells it Like it Is …

To All My Valued Employees,

There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company, and more specifically, your job. As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: The economy doesn’t pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job however, is the changing political landscape in this country. However, let me tell you some little tidbits of fact which might help you decide what is in your best interests.

First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner there is a back story. This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Mercedes outside. You’ve seen my big home at last years Christmas party. I’m sure; all these flashy icons of luxury conjure up some idealized thoughts about my life.

However, what you don’t see is the back story.

I started this company 28 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 300 square foot studio apartment for 3 years. My entire living apartment was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building acompany, which by the way, would eventually employ you.

My diet consisted of Ramen Pride noodles because every dollar I spent went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a defective transmission. I didn’t have time to date. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business – hard work, discipline, and sacrifice.

Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a modest $50K a year and spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the Nordstrom’s for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the discount store extracting any clothing item that didn’t look like it was birthed in the 70’s. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had.

So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9am, mentally check in at about noon, and then leave at 5pm, I don’t. There is no “off” button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat, and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to my hip like a 1 year old special-needs child. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden – the nice house, the Mercedes, the vacations … you never realize the back story and the sacrifices I’ve made.

Now, the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn’t. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed a decade of my life for.

Yes, business ownership has is benefits but the price I’ve paid is steep and not without wounds.

Unfortunately, the cost of running this business, and employing you, is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why:

I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don’t pay enough. I have state taxes. Federal taxes. Property taxes. Sales and use taxes. Payroll taxes. Workers compensation taxes. Unemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a tax man to manage all these taxes and then guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him. Government mandates and regulations and all the accounting that goes with it, now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a check to the US Treasury for $288,000 for quarterly taxes. You know what my “stimulus” check was? Zero. Nada. Zilch.

The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or, the single mother sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare check? Obviously, government feels the latter is the economic stimulus of this country.

The fact is, if I deducted (Read: Stole) 50% of your paycheck you’d quit and you wouldn’t work here. I mean, why should you? That’s nuts. Who wants to get rewarded only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree which is why your job is in jeopardy.

Here is what many of you don’t understand .. to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had suddenly government mandated to me that I didn’t need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000 into the Washington black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees, and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now.

When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don’t defibrillate and shock his thumb thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or, do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it.

Suddenly, the power brokers in Washington believe the poor of America are the essential drivers of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change you can keep.

So where am I going with all this? It’s quite simple.

If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I fire you. I fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your SUV, and your child’s future. Frankly, it isn’t my problem any more.

Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I’m done. I’m done with a country that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, will be my citizenship.

So, if you lose your job, it won’t be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country, steamrolled the constitution, and will have changed its landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about …

Signed,
Your boss

Obama, Change 1976 Style….

October 29, 2008

We’re getting close and as much as I didn’t want to vote for McRINO and wanted Obama to win (because “the GOP needs another lesson”), I’m actually fretting over Obama’s apparent ensured victory.

There is so many reasons not to vote for Obama that I’ve wanted to list them in one posting but everytime I think about writing it, I want to throw up in disgust.

Without getting into his personal racism, radicalism, corruption et al, let me just take this time to tell you what is wrong with him economically-

1) Economic “Change We Need” – The economic ‘change’ that Obama is trying to bring to us is nothing new. His policies are pretty much the exact same as Jimmy Carter’s in 1976- more taxes, more forced energy savings, more welfare. We did this in 1976 and it had disastrous effects economically and socially.

2) Social “Change We Need” – More welfare. Doesn’t anyone remember how many decades it took to get welfare reform passed through the government? Doesn’t anyone remember how bad the welfare fraud was/is? No one remembers the social impact of women having more kids “for a bigger check”?

3) National Policy “Change We Need” – As much as I think the Bush crew screwed up the handling of the past two wars, we have already seen the outcome of trying to reason with terrorists. Terrorists DO NOT PLAY BY THE RULES and never will. As far as making Europe and everyone else in the world like us more, do you remember the tale of the old-man, the child and the mule?

4) Healthcare “Change We Need” – Obama’s healthcare plan is un-doable as he promises. He’s promising more benefits than can be paid for. The next time you are standing in line at the DMV, only to get to the counter and deal with a rude government employee who could care less about her/his job and you’re frustrated with the service you received, think about the service you will get with government managed healthcare! I mean, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is doing SOOO GREAT!

Lastly, back to the economy- How can people be so stupid?!?!
1) The economic downturn we are experiencing now was caused by the Democrats (a shout out to Barney Frank).
2) The horrible $700,000,000,000 free hand-out (to their friends) was done by the Democrats (no one remembers Pelosi, surrounded by the Democrats happily announcing their pay-off!?!?)
3) The Obama/Biden “Raise the Taxes” economic plan is NOT JUST FOR THE RICH! It WILL raise the middle-class taxes and it WILL CAUSE UNEMPLOYMENT when businesses cut-back and move more operation off-shore to avoid US taxes.

I could go on, but I have to go to work to scrape some money together and pay some taxes and eek by on what’s left over…

Obama Is Going To Tax The Middle Class!

October 29, 2008

Obama has said that he’s only going to tax the ‘rich’ and will cut middle class taxes… BS! The ‘rich’ income is already coming down into middle class levels…

Rich =$250K… No, rich = $200K… No rich = $150K…

Demoncrats have NEVER lowered taxes on the middle class and they never will (in the foreseeable future).

Obama Supporter Gets A Lesson In Socialism…

October 25, 2008

Breda

From Breda’s wonderful blog comes a great entry: Death & taxes

But the real jewel of this entry was a comment from Old NFO

“Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read “Vote Obama, I need the money.” I laughed.

Once in the restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08” tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference — just imagine the coincidence.

When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need–the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.

I went outside, gave the homeless guy $5 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.

At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the server was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn, without his consideration of whether I should have even have don’t that; though in my opinion the actual recipient needed the server’s money more.

I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.”

Also, Docjim505 had a good comment:

“Socialism looks good to only three types of people:

1. Those with no money

2. Those who think they will control who gets the money, or at least that “bad” people will “pay”

3. The insane”

The Myth Of Taxing The Rich.

October 16, 2008

Demoncrats LOVE to “Tax the Rich” which is odd because the Demoncrats in power usually ARE “the rich”. I have never heard of the Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Rangel or any of them giving up tax exemptions and shelters so the the poor can have more but they LOVE TO TAX THE RICH!

The scam is that tax increases do not really affect the rich as much as they affect the middle-class. The reason- ‘the rich’ have more disposable income and can afford to ‘hide’ that money in deductions and tax shelters whereas the middle-class usually don’t have enough disposable money and ends up with only one tax-shelter, his/her house.

If you compare theoretical tax rates & actual tax rates vs ‘money coming in’, you’ll see that the middle-class bears the brunt (rate-wise) of this “tax the rich” system. See below-

So, when you hear Obama (or any other politician) saying that they are ‘only going to tax the rich’, they are lying to your face and you’re gonna get the shaft (while they max out their tax-deductions and shelters).

Warren Buffett even agrees- ” Warren Buffett, the third-richest man in the world, has criticized the US tax system for allowing him to pay a lower rate than his secretary and his cleaner.”

It’s The Economy Stupid

October 10, 2008

McCain’s numbers are down (roughly following that of the economy) and if polls are accurate (which they rarely are), we are about to put the people who caused this mess into power!

Who caused the current financial crisis? The democrats.

Who’s policies of “taxing the rich and corporations” (meaning the middle class as always) is going to drive more jobs out of the country into lower taxed areas of the world and cause un-employment on a Jimmy Carter scale? The democrats…

Who are screwed? Us.

Demoncrats Blantly Lying for the 5,787,654,456,001th Time

October 9, 2008

Ann Coulter has a good column on the Demoncrats attempts to lie about McCain involvement in the financial meltdown.

“McCain… …would still have absolutely nothing to do with the subprime mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. This crisis was caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending industry in the Clinton era.

Before the Democrats’ affirmative action lending policies became an embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in 1992, a majority-Democratic Congress “mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains.”

Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on banks to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton’s secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae for racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income borrowers by the year 2001.”

As bad as I think McAmnesty is, I think he tried to stop this mess before it happened.

READ THE COLUMN: They Gave Your Mortgage To A Less Qualified Minority