Fact of the matter is, HE DIDN’T LIE. Though, Whoopi, Barbara Walters, and the goofy red-head DID lie.

As for your contention that “anyone who has listened to Glenn Beck knows thats hes a lying sack of dog mess”, obviously, you’re wrong. I listen to him and I don’t think he’s “a lying sack of dog mess”.

“The thing that’s really important is the part about him not checking anything he says on his show for facts. He just said garbage and doesn’t care if it’s true or not.” – Show me the proof of that statement.

“on his show he portrays himself as a reporter” – No he doesn’t, as a matter of fact, if you watched the “The View” clip, he CLEARLY says that he’s not a reporter and doesn’t claim to be a reporter.

“I think my point has been made to those sheeple who just don’t get it yet.” – Yes, you’re clueless, we got it.

The thing that’s really important is the part about him not checking anything he says on his show for facts. He just said garbage and doesn’t care if it’s true or not. That is irresponsible, as on his show he portrays himself as a reporter and misleeads people.

Anyone who has watched his shows before knows he is a liar and disinfo snake. Those who would actually defend this buffoon, I would have to question their integrity as well.

I think my point has been made to those sheeple who just don’t get it yet.

Beck has witnesses as well.

Wow, they stole a page right out of Nancy Pelosi’s playbook.

Apparently, we are all done with this and I think you are are as tired of this as I am. I am closing the comments because I think everyone has said what was on their minds and I don’t want to have to deal with a new round.

As for Force vs Aggression-
1) You are coming into a ‘discussion’ at the tail-end. I have been arguing with ZAP supporters since I posted this ‘article’ (for the lack of a better word) way back in January (and across different blogs). The reason why I say this is because many ZAPers have used force/aggression interchangeably. I’m not the source of this interchangeability.
2) Why is it called ZAP and not ZFP???????

As for the picking of the options – I like your pick just fine. It proved me correct.

As for polls on my blog, if I wanted people’s opinions, I’d post polls (or allow comments)… oh wait.

As for the doubt of my readers – You ignored the point of me writing that. The point was to highlight the hypocrisy of ZAP… Care to read it again???

(BTW, A stands for AGGRESSION)

Regardless of what anyone else has told you, I have not initiated force on you, whatsoever. The sentence you quoted doesn’t call you a name, but merely say’s that I find what you say hypocritical. Calling someone a moron, and then whining about name calling is the epitome of hipocracy.

You don’t like that I didn’t pick one of your two options. You do not get to enumerate my allowed responses. Just set up polls with selected responses if you want to run your blog that way.

If my response has caused your ‘readers’ to suddenly have doubt regarding your character, then you have had trouble brewing before this post.

Aggression? We’re talking about FORCE, not aggression.

So, it ain’t them either.

UPDATE: I also wanted to mention that I would guess that very few Libertarians agree 100% with the LP’s positions (just as surely not all Republicans or Democrats agree 100% with their parties positions) but, that still doesn’t mean that they are not L, R or Ds. Despite what LNS might want to claim, I am a member of the LP, I do send donations and therefore, I am a Libertarian-BigL. No, I don’t agree with it’s positions 100%

It ain’t you.

My contention with ZAPers is not whether a person is nice or trust worthy, it’s the claim that if you don’t believe in ZAP, you’re not a libertarian.

I said: “…Which would prove you and you’re “We’re the True Libertarians” pals to be a bunch of idiots.”

I also said: “Lastly, since I wrote these pages, I think it pretty much proves that I’m not illiterate and that you’re a moron…”

I don’t see the name calling… I see a test and then proof of what I said, they are idiots and he was a moron. I didn’t see me make any unsubstantiated statements like “you’re a bigot” or “you’re illiterate”. Those were said by him and were clearly name-calling.

As for your options, I see you took the 3rd option… I have been in arguments with ZAPers that claim that voting, putting up signs, allowing a dog to come onto your yard and other trivial actions is ‘initiating aggression’. Now, you’re saying that the act of publicly calling me a hypocrite on my own blog and thus casting doubt on my character to my readers is not aggression? I’m sorry, you are “doin’ the ZAP twist”, Chubby Checker would be proud.